Re: [DebianGIS] Re: grass compilation problems
Hello Francesco,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:22:41 +0100 Francesco Paolo Lovergine
<frankie@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:43:48PM +0100, Stephan Holl wrote:
> > Hello Francesco,
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:45:00 +0100 "Francesco P. Lovergine"
> > <frankie@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:16:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:28 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Why wait? Which version would you rather have included in
> > > > > etch? I suspect 6.0.2 is the better one, and the version we
> > > > > want to include in etch. If it is, immediate upload is the
> > > > > best option.
> > > >
> > > > This far from the etch freeze, probably makes more sense to
> > > > upload right away, especially since 6.0.2 is a bug fix release.
> > > > Only consideration is the extra wait for testing users.
> > > > Anyways, the netcdf transition is probably more important to
> > > > get gdal/etc in.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The wating time is indeed for testing users, who currently have a
> > > completely broken version. netcdf seems finally hinted, so in
> > > brief we could have an almost working tool chain in etch. And
> > > that is a good thing to increase testing.
> > >
> > > > > Besides, the autobuilders failed to build grass on almost all
> > > > > archs, and a new upload might fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, only on a few (alpha, mips, mipsel):
> > > >
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=grass
> > > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=grass
> > > >
> > > > The logs for the failed builds are not yet on buildd.d.o :(
> > > >
> > >
> > > -2 failed, not -3 which is currently buildable. Also, grass is a
> > > damn heavy beast for autobuilders, so I would avoid to uploading
> > > too often.
> >
> > Is the build based on the CVS-debian-files on alioth. If so, we
> > would be happy to update the current files in upstream GRASS_CVS
> > for the debian-build to have a propper debian-folder also inside
> > the GRASS_CVS.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Stephan
> >
>
> Sure, not yet updated for 6.0.2 anyway. It will be so soon, but
> currently change quite often in respect with the stable grass tree. A
> different branch should go for 6.1cvs (patches needs updates)
>
This sounds good to me to have another branch for the
CVS-Version of GRASS 6.1.
Looking forward to update upstreams CVS with correct
debian-folder-information.
Best
Stephan
--
GDF Hannover - Solutions for spatial data analysis and remote sensing
Hannover Office - Mengendamm 16d - D-30177 Hannover
Internet: www.gdf-hannover.de - Email: holl@gdf-hannover.de
Phone : ++49-(0)511.39088507 - Fax: ++49-(0)511.39088508
Reply to: