On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:28 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Why wait? Which version would you rather have included in etch? I > suspect 6.0.2 is the better one, and the version we want to include in > etch. If it is, immediate upload is the best option. This far from the etch freeze, probably makes more sense to upload right away, especially since 6.0.2 is a bug fix release. Only consideration is the extra wait for testing users. Anyways, the netcdf transition is probably more important to get gdal/etc in. > Besides, the autobuilders failed to build grass on almost all archs, > and a new upload might fix it. Actually, only on a few (alpha, mips, mipsel): http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=grass http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=grass The logs for the failed builds are not yet on buildd.d.o :( -- bye, pabs http://pabs.zip.to
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part