[Pkg-grass-general] Debian GIS pakcage repository?
Is there a central place were we (the Debian GIS team)
are keeping our packages?
I propose that we all post our current packages with
comments to a central location so we all have an idea
how the various sub-projects (grass, postgis,
mapserver, gdal, and others) are progressing.
Just a thought
Jon
--- Hamish <hamish_nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > This week I built a new gdal package and tried to
> create a
> > gdalgrass-package. You can find both on our
> ftp-server ([1] and [2])
>
> nice
>
> > I am not informed about the current way how grass
> is
> > build [3] but I would prefer to have a libgrass
> and a libgrass-dev
> > package if possible. Thus it only needs a few
> files for building
> > gdalgrass and not the full grass modules but
> only the libraries to
> > connect to a grass database.
>
> does 5.7's "make libs" create what you need?
>
>
> > [3] I tried to look at [4] but there seems to be
> some error while
> > connecting to the database.
> > [4] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-grass/
>
> works for me.
>
>
> ====
> (maybe this is more for Steve..)
> cross-posted from the grass5 mailing list, re this
> change in GRASS CVS:
>
>
http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass-commit/2004-November/015869.html
>
>
> - --with-gdal=/usr/bin/gdal-config \
> + --with-gdal=/usr/local/bin/gdal-config \
>
>
> $ dpkg -L libgdal1-dev | grep gdal-config
> /usr/bin/gdal-config
> /usr/share/man/man1/gdal-config.1.gz
>
> ??? shouldn't it just be --with-gdal? Isn't that
> redundant now that GDAL
> is not optional, omit altogether?
>
>
>
> + --without-odbc
>
> The unixodbc-dev package is in the control file's
> "Build-Depends" list,
> why not use it?
>
>
>
> Hamish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: