Re: [Pkg-grass-general] Re: mapserver work
Thomas
would you mind explaining the "thread-safe problem" to
the list in more detail? The more of us that
understand it, the more we might be able to work for a
solution.
I will be testing another install of the mapserver
files this weekend on a freshly formated machine. I
will let you know how it goes.
Jon
--- Thomas Sondag <thomas@microdop.org> wrote:
> Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi Thomas,
> >given the recent successes in installing your
> packages, would it be feasible
> >for you to try and make it official? Would it be
> necessary to coordinate with
> >php debian developers?
> >All the best.
> >pc
> >
> >At 22:31, giovedì 11 novembre 2004, Thomas Sondag
> has probably written:
> >
> >
> Yes, I'll be happy to do that, I must test it with
> lintian (I didn't use
> it for a long time), cleaning a lot of things, and
> may be write some man
> page for mapserver-bin utilitys.
>
> And unfortunately yes, I think we must coordinate
> with php debian
> developers.
> Php mapscript tread safe problems seem difficult to
> fix, upstream
> developers are working on it since several years.
> So I provide php4-cgi-mapscript_4.3.9-2_i386.deb
>
<http://agrogeomatic.educagri.fr/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/php4/php4-cgi-mapscript_4.3.9-2_i386.deb>
>
> (php4-cgi --with-regex=system) and
> php4-cgi-mapscript-dev_4.3.9-2_all.deb
>
<http://agrogeomatic.educagri.fr/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/php4/php4-cgi-mapscript-dev_4.3.9-2_all.deb>
>
> (the build headers).
>
<http://agrogeomatic.educagri.fr/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/php4/php4-cgi-mapscript-dev_4.3.9-2_all.deb>
> I can make patch for the rule and the control file
> between this version
> and the official one.
>
> All source are available on my repository.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: