Bug#695661: #695661: gcc-4.7: Please fix build on powerpcspe
Am 15.12.2012 14:16, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 14/12/12 15:37, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h
>> is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and
>> default/v2.
>>
>> If you don't have another suggestion, I would adjust upstream to do
>> actually the same, but do via tm_file_list instead of tm_file (as you
>> suggested).
>
> Consider the attached patch: It does the same as the first patch but via
> tm_file_list instead of tm_file as described above. (Applying to the
> version in unstable, and with the experimental version there is
> generally the same issue.)
the chunk for config.gcc is wrong. You have to use tm_file here.
> Unfortunately, upon build, this also didn't work: Both tm_file and
> tm_file_list don't get passed to t-linux (and the other makefile snippets).
>
> My conclusion is that the tm_file (_list) passing doesn't work as
> intended (including upstream), and considering that all
> powerpc-linux-gnuspe(-v1) specific stuff in src/gcc/config/rs6000 is
> Debian specific (only in a debian/patch/*) and not working anyway as
> described previously, I guess -v1 support is negligible. (Also, can't
> test it.)
strange, seems to work on other architectures.
> For which reason does Debian need to explicitely port to gnuspev1 (when
> upstream's port is only bsd specific and obviously not working anyway)?
Sure, but then don't define a wrong multiarch name for that case.
Matthias
Reply to: