[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#695661: #695661: gcc-4.7: Please fix build on powerpcspe



Am 14.12.2012 14:34, schrieb Roland Stigge:
> On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>>> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the
>>> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively.
>>>
>>> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on
>>> some bsd variant). So doing it instead of t-linux in the powerpcspe
>>> case, when spe is present.
>>
>> is this wanted, e.g. defining all the MULTILIB macros?
> 
> No, not necessary.
> 
>> then better add the t-spe bits to the t-linux file.
> 
> Fine with that. That's actually what my very first patch did that I
> submitted with this report. So please take it. :-)

but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same multiarch
tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream.


Reply to: