Bug#695661: #695661: gcc-4.7: Please fix build on powerpcspe

[Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>]

On 14/12/12 15:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 14.12.2012 15:19, schrieb Roland Stigge:
>>> but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same multiarch
>>> tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream.
>>
>> In your other mail you wrote about tm_file being replaced by
>> tm_file_list. Should I assume that tm_file (which includes e500-double.h
>> by which the distinction of v1 is made) is included into tm_file_list
>> somehow (what I currently can't see), or should we patch
>> src/gcc/config.gcc to include e500-double.h into tm_file_list instead of
>> tm_file?
> 
> I don't know the powerpcspe target that well. Adding a header looks wrong.

That's what current upstream does in src/gcc/config.gcc: e500-double.h
is added to the tm_file (list) to make the distinction between v1 and
default/v2.

If you don't have another suggestion, I would adjust upstream to do
actually the same, but do via tm_file_list instead of tm_file (as you
suggested).

Would this be OK for you (i.e. Debian and forwarding upstream)?

Thanks in advance,

Roland