[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?



On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> >>>Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I
> >>>asked the question on debian-gcc.  Do you have any specific concerns?
> >
> >Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list?  I've googled
> >and found only anecdotal positive reports:
> >
> >   http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds?  I
> >>>will upload there.
> >>
> >>I don't have such a setup.
> >
> >OK, but someone must have a similar setup.  People are occasionally
> >rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions.  Anyone on the
> >debian-gcc list got an idea?
> 
> does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet
> rebuilt against the new gmp5?

Sure: I've been running that way at home for a year.  Why wouldn't it
work?

Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your
concerns in detail so that we could address them.

Thanks,
-Steve



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: