> > The only drawback here is that virtual packages creation is a process > > that is quite precisely defined in > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-lis > >t.txt and we would need to request for the creation of *a lot* of > > virtual packages...:-) > > > > Dumb question: would this be achievable? :) Not sure. And I'm not even sure that this would be accepted. > Well, for scripts which cover multiple languages, this should maybe just > be the script name... (e.g. latin, cyrillic). > > Should someone be in charge to maintain a list of these virtual packages > and arrange the creation process of new ones, or can anyone just create > one? I guess that is such virtual packages are accepted, then we'd better have someone (this team?) in charge of maintaining the list.
Description: Digital signature