On Sun, 09 May 2010 22:02:36 +1000 "Brendan Simon (eTRIX)" <brendan.simon@etrix.com.au> wrote: > On 9/05/10 8:50 PM, Neil Williams wrote: > > OK. I'm extending apt-grip to have architecture-selection support. > > It'll be useful in other areas too. > > I'll email the list when a Lenny Baked Grip is available. > > I'm happy enough to use Lenny for Baked packages. I was using Lenny > for a development host but I upgraded to Squeeze/Unstable as I emgrip > isn't in Lenny, and bringing it in would install a lot of libraries > from unstable which I tend to avoid when running Stable. > > Will I need emgrip to create Baked rootfs ?? I assume not if > multistrap can just access the emdebian Baked distro. But for > anything not in emdebian Baked that I want to modify, I will need to > use emgrip and thus need to use a testing/unstable development host. > Yes ?? Yes. One candidate for that is busybox (cross-built possibly along the lines of the busybox-crush package) and the kernel. > I guess my question is: is Baked intended to be usable on a Lenny > development host or is it designed for a Squeeze development host ?? I don't think I'll get time to backport emgrip to Lenny, so Baked is designed for a Squeeze development environment, preparing a rootfs based on Lenny, then migrating to Squeeze once Squeeze is stable. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
Attachment:
pgpOPV4YdpTy9.pgp
Description: PGP signature