Re: Xemacs needs help
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Xemacs needs help
- From: Jérôme Marant <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:10:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <20040226180623.GA1919@twcny.rr.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040226210409.GB13782@fencepost> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Quoting Brian Nelson <email@example.com>:
> Miles Bader <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Brian Nelson <email@example.com> writes:
> >> > RC bugs prevent packages to enter testing.
> >> And that's an ugly kludge that should be used minimally and only
> >> temporarily (again IMO).
> > Huh? It's pretty fundamental to the way the entire system works...
> I assumed Jerome was referring to a bug report whose sole purpose is to
> keep a package out of testing, which is not fundamental to the system.
No, I wasn't. But I have to admit I'd prefer it to go to experimental if
experimental were autobuilt.