Re: Xemacs needs help
- To: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Xemacs needs help
- From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:10:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1078128649.4042f0092f16d@imp1-q.free.fr>
- In-reply-to: <871xod9ruy.fsf@scabbers.bignachos.com>
- References: <20040226180623.GA1919@twcny.rr.com> <86brnllgs5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <20040226210409.GB13782@fencepost> <87u11dzg53.fsf@marant.org> <878yip9d8q.fsf@scabbers.bignachos.com> <1077879776.403f23e03975b@imp1-q.free.fr> <87brnhcxue.fsf@scabbers.bignachos.com> <buok7255ly8.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <871xod9ruy.fsf@scabbers.bignachos.com>
Quoting Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>:
> Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
>
> > Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> writes:
> >> > RC bugs prevent packages to enter testing.
> >>
> >> And that's an ugly kludge that should be used minimally and only
> >> temporarily (again IMO).
> >
> > Huh? It's pretty fundamental to the way the entire system works...
>
> I assumed Jerome was referring to a bug report whose sole purpose is to
> keep a package out of testing, which is not fundamental to the system.
No, I wasn't. But I have to admit I'd prefer it to go to experimental if
experimental were autobuilt.
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to: