[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-edu-doc: reworking content of binary packages


Wolfgang and Frans, thanks for your analysis here!

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 01:19:55PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
[audacity manual]
> My opinion: maybe useful in parts, but not what you would qualify as a 
> manual for users. Keep it on wiki.debian.org with a remark like 
> 'Outdated, but still useful in parts'. Drop it from weblate. Ship 
> already existing translations in legacy packages.

(based on the non quoted stuff) sounds good to me.
> Rosegarden:
> Hence the same suggestion as for the Audacity manual.

> -----
> The extremely outdated part about Coyote firewall has been excluded from 
> the AllInOne page recently, see:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Documentation/ITIL/AllInOne?action=info


> More content could be excluded, e.g. these sections:
> <<Include(DebianEdu/Documentation/ITIL/Infrastructure)>>
> <<Include(DebianEdu/Documentation/ITIL/InfrastructureSetup)>>
> <<Include(DebianEdu/Documentation/ITIL/UsefulCommands)>>
> But I'm undecided if this is a good idea, maybe better keep it like it 
> is now and treat it like the Audacity and Rosegarden manuals.

it be curious what the ITIL documentation authors think, Petter?


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

There are no jobs on a dead planet.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: