Hi, On Samstag, 20. März 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Also I think such a pam module is bad idea as it is a bad idea, to > > use the login password to protect ssh keys with. > > It work the other way around, where it allow you to log in using the > ssh key password (and ignore the password in /etc/shadow/LDAP/NIS). Oh well. Thanks for enlighten me and I will file a bug now. > > IMO we dont loose anything if we drop it from our radar. > No problem for me. I belive it was added when we believed it would > start ssh-agent when the user logged in. This is not done by this pam > module, and we do not need libpam-ssh to get that behaviour. :) So more time wasted due to this descrition... lets get rid of this. cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.