Hi Dario, On Freitag, 22. Januar 2010, Dario Minnucci wrote: > I may be interested in taking over this package. do you mean svk (as per subject of this mail) or etcinsvk (as per package to which this bug belongs)? etcinsvk is maintained fine (but etckeeper is probably a better alternative), svk on the other hand is free to adopt. are you interested? abrazos, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.