[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#557074: svk scheduled for removal

Hi Holger,

> do you mean svk (as per subject of this mail) or etcinsvk (as per package to
> which this bug belongs)?
> etcinsvk is maintained fine (but etckeeper is probably a better alternative),
> svk on the other hand is free to adopt. are you interested?

My fault! I was talking about 'etcinsvk' (sorry for the mess).

I'm currently using etckeeper. Everybody says that maybe it's a better alternative, AFAIK doesn't
support SVN , so it's not the better alternative for me right now! :(

Thanks for your time.


 Dario Minnucci <midget@debian.org>
 Phone: +34 902021030 | Fax: +34 902024417 | Support: +34 807450000
 Key fingerprint = 62FF F60F CE79 9CE4 EBA8  523F FC84 1B2D 82C8 B711

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: