[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: terminology

nigel barker wrote:
> Looking at the release info, I am wondering about a couple of things:
> "low-fat clients" sounds crappy. I know this has been discussed
> before, and I'm sorry. I'm pretty sure the term should be "thick
> client", but I know a lot of you guys think that's wrong, in which
> case you could use "semi-thick client" or stick to the old "diskless
> workstation", which actually conveys more meaning I think.

i use diskless workstation, thin client, and workstation. Since all this
talk about what machine is fatter then the other is just vauge and


Reply to: