Hi, On Monday 23 July 2007 16:25, Holger Levsen wrote: > Now I like to suggest the following "new" meaning to priorities: > > p1 = we need to fix this immediatly or within the next 5 days > p2 = we will not release r1 without that fixed > p3 = we want to fix that before we release r1, but maybe we will not manage > p4 = we will not fix this for etch, but for lenny > p5 = we will fix this someday > > Please comment. > > I also suggest we finalize a rough schedule for when we plan to release > 3.0r1 at our next meeting on 2007-08-13 18:00 UTC. I'd suggest something > like end of August or mid September. After thinking about this a bit more, I came to a bit different proposal: IMO we should aim to^w^w release 3.0r1 in a month, even if only/mostly with documentation fixes (though other fixes are fine too). Then r2 another month later. And then concentrate on lenny. Therefore we could also say: p1 = we need to fix this immediatly or within the next 5 days p2 = we will not release r1 without that fixed p3 = we will not release r2 without that fixed p4 = we want to fix that before we release r2, but maybe we will not manage p5 = we will not fix this for etch, but for lenny What do you think? regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpDI7ag8xFxX.pgp
Description: PGP signature