Re: How bandwidth requirement could be reduced when using thin clients?
Knut Yrvin wrote:
In Norway the the Norwegian Competition Authority has instructed the 
Directorate for Primary and Secondary Education to support open 
standards in education. The Directorate are also investigated for 
supporting[1] Microsoft by flooding schools with free copies of 
software behemoth Microsoft's programs. In a meeting with Skolelinux 
1th of september the Directorate promised[2] to give 100% support to 
schools that uses Skolelinux. So the tables has turned. They who don't 
support free software has to explain them self to the Competition 
Authority. They who recomended us to take contact with the Competition 
Authority was the Ministry of Transport and Communications. 
Theres a similar investigation in the UK, with the Microsoft in Schools 
agreement coming under scrutiny, but TBH I dont see much coming of it 
for years yet. As the powers that be are quite content to buy 2003 
server at £60 a go, were using the approach of 'Teach Computing, not 
Teach Microsoft'.
When it comes to user evaluation of Skolelinux, The municipal department 
of education in Oslo has tested Skolelinux at three schools. They 
report the same as Statskonsult that says[3]: 
  Skolelinux is a good product for the schools, satisfying all 
  of the main needs of the schools. It is inexpensive, stable and 
  can be used together with varous learning platforms and 
  learning portals. Using thin clients, Skolelinux in a 
  school environment is less expensive to acquire and 
  operate than different Windows versions.
  [...]
  According to our evaluation, Skolelinux is well suited for 
  use in the school.
I'd be very interested to hear how you handled the training issues with 
the staff, this has been our major sticking point with the adoption.
Regards,
Ben
--
    On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 
'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the 
right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of 
confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
Charles Babbage
Reply to: