Re: draft ballot: please rule on how to implement debian/rules build-arch
- To: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: draft ballot: please rule on how to implement debian/rules build-arch
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:46:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120127084653.GD31841@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20120127081252.GA24091@gaara.hadrons.org>
- References: <20110723134507.GB10814@virgil.dodds.net> <20120102103650.GA20085@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <20120112161514.GH9330@codelibre.net> <20120112162740.GC21664@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <20120112164718.GI9330@codelibre.net> <20120120183959.GA21675@gaara.hadrons.org> <20120124112540.GH13268@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <20120126235926.GB21313@gaara.hadrons.org> <20120127072222.GB26826@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <20120127081252.GA24091@gaara.hadrons.org>
[ moving to debian-dpkg, it's not interesting for tech-ctte anymore ]
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Yes, I reorganized my thoughts while sleeping, in essence I'm mostly
> concerned about the *possibility* of building/using old sources and
> binaries, and as long as there's a way, even if behind --force- or
> other similar options I don't have any problem with that.
OK, that makes sense. But this is something we can take care of when
we're going to drop this make -qn check.
> > +unless ($buildtarget eq "build" or scalar(@debian_rules) > 1) {
> > + # Verify that build-{arch,indep} are supported. If not, fallback to build.
> > + # This is a temporary measure to not break too many packages on a flag day.
>
> It still would be nice to wrap this under 80 chars. :)
By my vim's count, they are at 78 and 79 chars. :-)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/
Reply to: