Re: libqwt-dev: apt reinstalls the package
- To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Cc: 631816@bugs.debian.org, David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com>, 631816-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, cupt@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: libqwt-dev: apt reinstalls the package
- From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:33:46 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20111217093346.GA9936@r500-debian>
- Mail-followup-to: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, 631816@bugs.debian.org, David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com>, 631816-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, cupt@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111216232535.GA1154@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
- References: <[🔎] CAAZ6_fAPMooOAOV6dA6c+c3xQj94KU0vB45PFMc2qV+2Dy21jA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20111216131040.GB4903@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <[🔎] 20111216162140.GF13260@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20111216163624.GB31775@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <[🔎] 20111216165108.GA32135@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <[🔎] 20111216205534.GA1018@r500-debian> <[🔎] 20111216232535.GA1154@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Hello,
On 2011-12-16 17:25, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > By the way, using this interpretation for epoch too, a version ':1.2.3'
> > would be also correct?
>
> No, a version ':1.2.3' would still not be allowed, since there is a
> colon but the text before it ("") is not a number, violating
>
> This is a single (generally small) unsigned integer.
Next sentence: "It may be omitted, in which case zero is assumed.", same
as for debian_revision.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Reply to: