[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] dpkg-buildpackage development goal

On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:13:41AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On the other hand one could argue that dpkg-buildpackage should
> intentionally remain simple and that people are expected to write
> their own wrappers or replacements if they need.

I like this thought.  On the other hand, something like integrating
dpkg-sig(s) functionality might be a good thing to do.


Reply to: