Re: debian-faq: notes on systemd obsolete
Hi again Justin e.a.,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:40:54PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46:50AM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote:
> > Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > +<p>Instead of <i>runlevels</i>, as used on traditional
> [...]
> > > > +
> > > > +<p>Service file <tt>/lib/systemd/rc.local.service</tt> provides an easy way to
> > >
> > > concept: we seem to be using italics for those
> > >
> > > +<p>The <i>service file</i> <tt>/lib/systemd/rc.local.service</tt> provides an easy way to
> >
> > Uh, there is no such file, at least on my system,
I have systemd 232-25+deb9u1 installed, which gets shipped with Debian 9.1
stretch; this systemd ships /lib/systemd/system/rc.local.service , which says
[...]
# This unit gets pulled automatically into multi-user.target by
# systemd-rc-local-generator if /etc/rc.local is executable.
[Unit]
Description=/etc/rc.local Compatibility
[...]
> > and this seems to be
> > talking as if admins were meant to create it in /lib/systemd/. Don't
> > local modifications go in /etc/systemd/? Wouldn't users need lots
> > more help to be able to create a working .service file from scratch?
So, I guess we're fine with the current text.
> > > > +run customized scripts in the file <tt>/etc/rc.local</tt> after boot-up,
> > > > +similar to what's offered on Debian systems running System-V style init.
[snip some as-is applied suggestions, thanks]
Bye,
Joost
PS: I might upload the FAQ soonish. It depends on what happens with
https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2017/11/msg00023.html .
Current version still available from
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq/ .
Reply to: