[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#599184: release-notes: section about backports.org not necessary?

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 16:38:01 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 01:37:12PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > The current versions of iceweasel, linux-2.6 and openoffice.org in
> > > lenny-bpo seem to be older than the versions in squeeze, and there is no
> > > X.Org backport afaik.  So maybe these paragraphs are not necessary?
> > > 
> > > Adding Rhonda in cc for comments as bpo admin.
> > 
> > do you have some input on this?
> According to http://backports.debian.org/lenny-backports/overview/
> there are a few packages which have a version in bp > squeeze.
> Namely duplicity, kvm, postgresql-8.4, two libdatetime*.
kvm is a false positive, it's no longer a source package in squeeze.
postgresql-8.4 is probably a bit of a special case due to the upload of
9.0 in sid which prevents transitions to squeeze.  Why was the rest
allowed into lenny-backports?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: