Re: Switching from CVS to something else
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I agree that moving the documentation CVS over to Alioth will have one
> > advantage (adding users, no need for DSA to get involved) but I don't really
> > see the advantage of switching to a different VCS for the DDP's repository.
>
> After some thought, I agree. Just moving to CVS to new CVS is best.
Ok, then I should be able to planifiy that.
First of all, do we want to keep the "unix group name" of "cvs_doc" on
Alioth or should we create a new "ddp" project that I would populate with
the same members?
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/cvs_doc
> Then each section (like apt-howto) can chose different VCS as long as we
> have control over build script. That is what we lack now. We only
> offer Makefile but its execution and copying to the web is done by
> non-DDP resources.
Yes, it's done on www-master AFAIK and thus the people who have access to
it are the members of the debwww group:
$ getent group debwww
debwww:x:10803:csmall,treacy,archvsync,evo,mendoza,kraai,joy,djpig,joey
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Reply to: