[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debiandoc-sgml update



On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:27:31PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:53:18AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:04:19PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Hi, I am BTS cleaning mode :-)
> > Again: It works well on my Woody and Sarge box but www-masters version
> > of apt-howto.ko.pdf has wrong fonts. Can someone check whether
> > hlatex and hlatex-fonts-base are installed? If yes I assume Recommends:
> > is incomplete (I added already gs and cjk-latex, ..., a few
> > Chinese/Japanese fonts are still missing in Recommends since I had no
> > time to check that all fonts used in debian-reference package are really
> > necessary).
> 
> I think hlatex-fonts-base dependency should not be declared directly by
> debiandoc-sgml.  Instead, each documentation package needs to declare
> all required packages to build by tracing recommend path.
> 

Yeah, I am affirmative with this opinion. :)

> I think recommending hlatex just the same way as cjk-latex is good
> enough.  Let's hlatex and cjk-latex maintaner worry and suggests font
> sets.

I am not sure Changwoo (hlatex-* maintainer) read this ML. 

> 
> > > * 286537 Paper size
> > > This needs to be fixed if report is true.  So stays normal.
> > 
> > Bug confirmed and fixed.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > > * L10N support data
> > > GREEK 283260, ARABIC 286240 support info: request to ML with
> > > instruction.
> > > Slovenian 291481 is good.  We need to prepare a patch (Expand
> > > documentation for how to add new locales)
> > 
> > Slovenian added (and bogus LaTeX code from patch fixed).
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > > Jens's patch to German belongs to this category too.
> > 
> > A really minor fix :-)
> 
> Good.
> 
> > > * 202315 CJK PDF/PS
> > > Together with wishlist 229849, 244625 bugs with seemingly good fix
> > > proposals, this bug needs to be fixed.  Ask Jens to look into this with
> > > current Korean fix issues. (See below) I consider them as normal bugs.
> > 
> > Done.
> 

Good works! :-)

> Great.
> 
> > > * 214249 Style (TeX)
> > > If this is a good patch, I can agree to keep it in minor.
> > 
> > Fixed (80% of it was already fixed in the past).
> 
> Good.
> 
> > > * 202317 touch up script
> > > This capability will greatly helps unifying support of many
> > > documentation.  Current patch is non-functional thus removed but this is
> > > worth attacking, I think.  Please think about it when you look script.
> > 
> > Sorry, I didn't tried your patch but propose a new one which works.
> > But I think your patch looks good as well!
> 
> But you put some fix code with manpage.  That is great.
> 
> > I also fixed partially #244625 by changing "\dots " to \dots{}"
> > which adds a space after ... when necessary. The fonts related
> > stuff is not applied since I never play with fonts, I use defaults
> > especially in LaTeX.
> 
> I agree not to play too much into fonts.
> > > Please.  Can you check all TeX style related patch and propose good
> > > patch.
> > > 
> > >  229849
> > 
> > Not yet fixed.
> 
> Let's leave this until someone care enough to send a patch.
> 
> > >  244625 (patch exist)
> > 
> > Partially fixed.
> 
> Maybe your text mixed a bit.  So you fixed "..." but not font, I guess.
> Let's close this bug if this is the case.   Let's send note to bug
> before closing this by the next paqckage :-)
> 
> > PS: I forgot to remove a few Todo items in source package.
> 
> Also you did not update debian/TODO
> 
> Osamu
> 
> PS: With updated changelog etc, I reuploaded to p.d.o/~osamu with the
> same version number.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
--
Yooseong Yang  <yooseong@debian.org>
Debian(-KR) Developer 
<http://www.debian.org> <http://www.debian.or.kr>
<http://master.debian.or.kr/~yooseong>
------------------------------------------------
CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: