Re: debiandoc-sgml update
- To: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debiandoc-sgml update
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:27:31 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050208182731.GB12691@aokiconsulting.com>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20050131005318.GA18768@pluto>
- References: <20041226131248.GA16071@aokiconsulting.com> <871xdcf66t.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <20050102223758.GB22159@aokiconsulting.com> <20050111004451.GA16599@aokiconsulting.com> <20050114081119.GB14481@enc.com.au> <20050114190713.GA19648@aokiconsulting.com> <20050123214431.GA20004@aokiconsulting.com> <20050123224547.GA9128@pluto> <20050124210419.GA19619@aokiconsulting.com> <20050131005318.GA18768@pluto>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:53:18AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:04:19PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi, I am BTS cleaning mode :-)
> Again: It works well on my Woody and Sarge box but www-masters version
> of apt-howto.ko.pdf has wrong fonts. Can someone check whether
> hlatex and hlatex-fonts-base are installed? If yes I assume Recommends:
> is incomplete (I added already gs and cjk-latex, ..., a few
> Chinese/Japanese fonts are still missing in Recommends since I had no
> time to check that all fonts used in debian-reference package are really
> necessary).
I think hlatex-fonts-base dependency should not be declared directly by
debiandoc-sgml. Instead, each documentation package needs to declare
all required packages to build by tracing recommend path.
I think recommending hlatex just the same way as cjk-latex is good
enough. Let's hlatex and cjk-latex maintaner worry and suggests font
sets.
> > * 286537 Paper size
> > This needs to be fixed if report is true. So stays normal.
>
> Bug confirmed and fixed.
Thanks.
> > * L10N support data
> > GREEK 283260, ARABIC 286240 support info: request to ML with
> > instruction.
> > Slovenian 291481 is good. We need to prepare a patch (Expand
> > documentation for how to add new locales)
>
> Slovenian added (and bogus LaTeX code from patch fixed).
Thanks.
> > Jens's patch to German belongs to this category too.
>
> A really minor fix :-)
Good.
> > * 202315 CJK PDF/PS
> > Together with wishlist 229849, 244625 bugs with seemingly good fix
> > proposals, this bug needs to be fixed. Ask Jens to look into this with
> > current Korean fix issues. (See below) I consider them as normal bugs.
>
> Done.
Great.
> > * 214249 Style (TeX)
> > If this is a good patch, I can agree to keep it in minor.
>
> Fixed (80% of it was already fixed in the past).
Good.
> > * 202317 touch up script
> > This capability will greatly helps unifying support of many
> > documentation. Current patch is non-functional thus removed but this is
> > worth attacking, I think. Please think about it when you look script.
>
> Sorry, I didn't tried your patch but propose a new one which works.
> But I think your patch looks good as well!
But you put some fix code with manpage. That is great.
> I also fixed partially #244625 by changing "\dots " to \dots{}"
> which adds a space after ... when necessary. The fonts related
> stuff is not applied since I never play with fonts, I use defaults
> especially in LaTeX.
I agree not to play too much into fonts.
> > Please. Can you check all TeX style related patch and propose good
> > patch.
> >
> > 229849
>
> Not yet fixed.
Let's leave this until someone care enough to send a patch.
> > 244625 (patch exist)
>
> Partially fixed.
Maybe your text mixed a bit. So you fixed "..." but not font, I guess.
Let's close this bug if this is the case. Let's send note to bug
before closing this by the next paqckage :-)
> PS: I forgot to remove a few Todo items in source package.
Also you did not update debian/TODO
Osamu
PS: With updated changelog etc, I reuploaded to p.d.o/~osamu with the
same version number.
Reply to: