Re: DDP restoration plan proposal (medium-term move to Alioth)
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:25:56AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Ok, here's my proposal on how should DDP be restored:
> I basically agree your proposal for module "debian-doc/ddp".
> For module "debian-doc/manpages", let them move to alioth now unless
> these are published on debian web page. (Clarification?) This should
> make everyone happy.
> As for your concern for the build script, maybe running them under chroot
> environment (a la pbuilder) may reduce risks. Just my 2 cents.
> As for translator, I think that my previously posted review may help
> reduce their tasks. So please refer to it when you post to other list.
Just my two cents for publishing:
a. Remove all makefiles from the (future) alioth DDP repository.
b. Remove all data/sgml files from current old-gluck repository.
A script on gluck can automatically (over-)write all makefiles within a checkout
copy of the alioth repository, and publish soon after. That's all.
Little variants of this approach could be considered (e.g.data files for selecting
Francesco P. Lovergine