Re: Status of the index for Woody Cd's?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > Even if you did one, I very much doubt AJ would allow it in woody, that's
> > why I haven't done it myself. Clearly this is not a release-critical issue,
> > and there is still a slim possibility that a new .deb could be broken
> > despite the fact it contains only documentation.
> Given the interest that Aj and other ftpmasters have shown
> regarding documentation issues I have to agree with you there.
Well, given the facts and circumstances it would be unreasonable to expect
> In any case I do not see how a package that only contains text/html files
> can break (well, yes, maybe the installation).
Installation, and doc-base. God knows I made many silly errors in those
> - documentation bug fixes are allowed, since good documentation is
> Now, two questions:
> 1.- does this still apply? (i.e. should this paragraph be commented
> out and changed from 'frozen' to 'testing')
> Adam, are you reading this?
That was written by Adam who is clearly a documenter and not the release
I've in the meantime noticed that doc-debian 3.0 still isn't in sid and
mailed ajt-woody-sucks about it.
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org