Re: Procedure for uploading new material?
Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>I assume that since the need for such a procedure starts to arise now
>we have several people working on one document, we'll start discussion
>this (real) soon (this is where Christian comes in :-). I've already
>some ideas for this, so maybe we can start this discussion shortly?
>So, since I already got your version, I could simply put it in my CVS
>repository and put out a new version of the complete manual. On the
>other hand I already saw some suggestions for improvements, so I think
>it's better if you first gather all comments, work them out, and then
>we'll put it in the official sources. What do you think?
I've incorporated the suggested changes. Should I continue to upload
through the list? It is certainly likely that there will be further
changes, after all.
>As far as the integration is concerned, you could keep your chapter in
>a separate file and write in another file an empty framework to keep
>SGML happy. Using so-called entities you "include" your chapter into
>the framework. That's how I'm organizing the manual to keep including
>source updates easy.
That's what I did; the particular point I had was that I had to alter
debiandoc.dtd in order to define the entity for inclusion into the
skeleton manual. That seems quite undesirable. Have I misunderstood
how to do this in SGML?
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
Unsolicited email advertisements are not welcome; any person sending
such will be invoiced for telephone time used in downloading together
with a £25 administration charge.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .