Re: ps in cloud images

[mooff <mooff@awful.cooking>]

I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:

$ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
bash: ps: command not found
root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#

> I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org` would be the > place to 
discuss this

Thanks Paul. I wasn't sure where to send it.

On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 11:21:29 -0700, Noah Meyerhans 
<noahm@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 09:33:54PM +0100, mooff wrote:
> >  IMO, many human hours will be lost by the decision not to include 
> > procps in
> >  the default cloud images.
> >
> >  I understand it could be a security measure, but maybe stubs could 
> > be
> >  offered which name the package we want (procps)
> >
> >  Tracing my third call to apt-file search bin/ps ;)
>
> What cloud images are you looking at?  The images built by the Debian
> cloud team *do* include procps.  See the manifests for (some of) the
> current bullseye images, all of which indicate that procps is 
> included:
>
> https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-ec2-arm64.json
> https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-generic-amd64.json
> https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-azure-amd64.json