Re: ps in cloud images
Dnia Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:59:25 +0100, mooff napisał(a):
> I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
>
> $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
> bash: ps: command not found
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
Then, https://hub.docker.com/_/debian says:
"Where to file issues:
https://github.com/debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts/issues";
And there we have:
https://github.com/debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts/issues/20
-- "Missing procps package or feature?"
> > I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org` would be the > place to discuss
> this
>
> Thanks Paul. I wasn't sure where to send it.
>
> On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 11:21:29 -0700, Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 09:33:54PM +0100, mooff wrote:
> > > IMO, many human hours will be lost by the decision not to include
> > > procps in
> > > the default cloud images.
> > >
> > > I understand it could be a security measure, but maybe stubs could
> > > be
> > > offered which name the package we want (procps)
> > >
> > > Tracing my third call to apt-file search bin/ps ;)
> >
> > What cloud images are you looking at? The images built by the Debian
> > cloud team *do* include procps. See the manifests for (some of) the
> > current bullseye images, all of which indicate that procps is included:
> >
> > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-ec2-arm64.json
> > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-generic-amd64.json
> > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-azure-amd64.json
>
>
--
Michał Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practiced carelessly.
Reply to: