Re: merged /usr considered harmful (was Re: Bits from the Technical Committee)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:56:18 +0200, Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org>
wrote:
>On 2021/07/15 09:04, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Just to confirm, when you say "merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs", you mean
>> what I would get if I typed 'debootstrap bullseye /foo', right?
>>
>> I would like to note that the TC decision did not specify any particular
>> implementation of merged-/usr. It was just about whether to continue to
>> try to support both.
>
>I think a more detailed explanation/expansion/clarification on what
>exactly this means (and ideally also the rationale behind) that in the
>bug report would be appreciated.
Can we please delay this discussion until after the release? I don't
think we can afford an additional time sink at the moment. Please, get
bullseye out of the door first, then decide how many existing users
we're going to drive away from Debian in the next round.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: