[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian

> It's supposed to represent everyone who fights for a future where software is open

Is it possible?  To reopresent everyone.

Shouldn't he instead represent that he's expected to represent?

>From the fsf.org:
Our Core Work

The FSF maintains historic articles covering free software philosophy and
maintains the Free Software Definition - to show clearly what must be
true about a particular software program for it to be considered free software.

The FSF publishes the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL)
and so on.

Here is nothing about rms (or any FSF leader/board stuff/member) must
represent _you_.  Or me, in turn.

> I mean not even the fr*cking FSFE knew about that

Why it should?  Different organization.

> And there was no apology from RMS

There was no apology from RMS "critics", which e.g. improperly quote RMS
in the case of Minsky "defence" (the blame was itself is a lie).

> We as a project that believes that diversity and democracy

You place your political opinion for members of the project, which even
can't vote.  Is this a democracy?

> Obviously, everyone is free to disagree and can sign the support letter.
> There is no problem

See above.  That's not a problem for you, yes.

Reply to: