Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian
> It's supposed to represent everyone who fights for a future where software is open
Is it possible? To reopresent everyone.
Shouldn't he instead represent that he's expected to represent?
>From the fsf.org:
---->8----
...
Our Core Work
The FSF maintains historic articles covering free software philosophy and
maintains the Free Software Definition - to show clearly what must be
true about a particular software program for it to be considered free software.
...
The FSF publishes the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL)
...
---------->8------
and so on.
Here is nothing about rms (or any FSF leader/board stuff/member) must
represent _you_. Or me, in turn.
> I mean not even the fr*cking FSFE knew about that
Why it should? Different organization.
> And there was no apology from RMS
There was no apology from RMS "critics", which e.g. improperly quote RMS
in the case of Minsky "defence" (the blame was itself is a lie).
> We as a project that believes that diversity and democracy
You place your political opinion for members of the project, which even
can't vote. Is this a democracy?
> Obviously, everyone is free to disagree and can sign the support letter.
> There is no problem
See above. That's not a problem for you, yes.
Reply to: