On 2021-01-15 12:11:06 +0100 (+0100), Emanuele Rocca wrote: [...] > So the current situation is that we make an active effort to > produce two different types of installation media: one that works > for all users, and one broken for most laptops. [...] The one you say "works for all users" doesn't "work" for me because it contains proprietary closed-source software I don't want. This boils down to a debate over whether the Debian community values convenience over ideals. It can be argued that for users who value convenience more, Ubuntu already exists. Why compete with that and compromise Debian's ideals at the same time? -- Jeremy Stanley
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature