Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:40:25 -0700, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>> On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>> > accept that they are authoritative in this regard. Therefore, you should
>> > rename the offensive parts of this package.
>
>> He certainly should NOT rename any parts of the package without upstream
>> consent. If upstream doesn’t approve (and it seems that these names are part
>> of upstream’s working culture), then the other choices are removing to
>> package or keeping it as it is.
>
>Your "should not" does not follow from any of Debian's core principles
>(DFSG, Debian Social Contract, Diversity Statement).
Staying compatible with the rest of the world is not covered by our
core principles?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: