On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
accept that they are authoritative in this regard. Therefore, you should rename the offensive parts of this package.
He certainly should NOT rename any parts of the package without upstream consent. If upstream doesn’t approve (and it seems that these names are part of upstream’s working culture), then the other choices are removing to package or keeping it as it is.
Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature