On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Di, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49:55 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > accept that they are authoritative in this regard. Therefore, you should > > rename the offensive parts of this package. > He certainly should NOT rename any parts of the package without upstream > consent. If upstream doesn’t approve (and it seems that these names are part > of upstream’s working culture), then the other choices are removing to > package or keeping it as it is. Your "should not" does not follow from any of Debian's core principles (DFSG, Debian Social Contract, Diversity Statement). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature