On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:38:56AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > The experimental distribution is a good place for work in > > > progress. Maybe the rules for automatic rejects can be relaxed for > > > experimental so a package can go into the archive (and have e.g. the BTS > > > used for that version) if the maintainer doesn't want to fix the reject > > > right away. > > > > I see a problem with relaxing the rules - if a project is in > > experimental one could (theoretical) upload it to unstable too - without > > any changes, because it is in the repository. > > Can we please work on the assumption that Debian Contributors know what > they're doing? In that case please abolish NEW. > Our (NM and other) processes are extensive enough to make > that assumption valid in the general case. Not all DDs got through NM AFAIK. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature