Re: NEW and RC bugs (Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Chris Lamb writes ("Re: NEW and RC bugs (Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> >    [..]  Compared to REJECT mails:
> >      - Discussions in the BTS are more transparent
> >      - Discussions in the BTS are better organised
> >      - Discussions in the BTS can have wider participation
> >      - Discussions in the BTS are better archived
> >      - Discussions in the BTS have better metadata
> 
> This would be a fairly-accurate precis of my position.
> 
> Indeed, I tend to ACCEPT whilst filing a bug at the same time with
> varying degrees of severity through RC-level (#910031, #910656),
> normal (#911532) and wishlist (#910029, #910330), etc. etc.

I think this is exemplary practice.

> (As an aside, some tags cannnot be overridden but that's not quite
> on-topic here…)

I doubt these are likely to be very controversial.  And, yes.

Thanks,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.