Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:31 +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask*
> when unsure or uncertain of something.
> So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useless, and as it often happens
> in those cases, it's causing headaches for somebody.
Maybe introducing epochs should force a round-trip through NEW...
That would completely ruin my plan to only ever release version 1.0 of
all of my future projects, but increase the epoch instead.
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.