On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:59:29PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > My advice would be to avoid asking the TC such general questions. My advice too. > There are two sensible questions: > > * Should the following bugs be RC ? > [ list of 20 bugs or whatever ] with a list of 20 bugs I dont think it's sensible. With one, yes, sure. With two, probably… > * I proposed the following patch to policy. I haven't seen this yet, or rather I haven't heard that this was done yet. > Despite it being > seconded, So this has neither happened… > the policy editors have not responded to my request > to amend policy. [or whatever] … so this neither… > + A FTBFS bug is still RC even if: > + it doesn't happens on buildd.debian.net; > + it only happens randomly; > + it only happens on machines with one (virtual) cpu core. while I do agree that these are *not* good criterias to justify whether something is *not* RC, I fear there are bugs for which this is true, however the justification why they are not RC is different. And this is why patches to policy are hard :) -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature