Re: If you can't describe what the package is, you probably should not Intend To Package it.
Adam Borowski writes ("Re: If you can't describe what the package is, you probably should not Intend To Package it."):
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Maybe adding a note stating 'this content is autogenerated and should
> > be hand-reviewed', in all of the dh-make-*-enerated packages, would
> > help?
> Especially when paired with an autoreject, yes.
Maybe as well as a stick, a carrot or at least some words that might
suggest useful things to wrote:
[ delete as (in)applicable: This package is part of XXX system /
used by XXX / needed as a build-dependency of XXX ]
Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.