[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: missing -dbgsym packages on uploads by maintainer(s)



On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:44:34AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >  - there is a special field in the .changes file (automatically
> >    set by buildds) to tell dak to keep the debs
> >    e.g. Keep-Binaries: yes
> 
> if the only valid usecase of binary uploads is bootstraping an arch
> (which I'm not sure is the only valid use case, but I cannot come up
> with another right now…), I think we shouldnt allow individual
> maintainers to overwrite this and upload binaries. Rather I'd propose to
> allow this for all packages of an architecture, which is being
> bootstrapped right now.
> 
> And once it's bootstrapped, we disallow it again.

Architectures are not the only things that gets bootstrapped.
compilers are another common thing, as is breaking build-dependency
chains.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: