Re: unattended-upgrades by default?
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:47:28 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> To solve the issue and provide security updates by default, I'm
> proposing that we should switch to installing unattended-upgrades by
> default (and enabling it too) *unless* something else in the
> installation is already expected to deal with security updates.
>
> Thoughts?
Is there a way to mark network connections as "expensive", and thus u-a
does nothing if only connected via that?
It would be very annoying to have packages automatically downloaded when
tethering my phone connection.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
Reply to: