On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 01:10:42AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > So yes, copyright files are hard and unfun but why should we continue > > to write them the way we do if we are not legally bound to do so? > > Same reason that we should continue to care about ability to install > multiple major versions of a library concurrently, and that daemons are > not only linked correctly but also sensibly configured and started by > default. > > Not because we are legally bound to do so, but because we want to do our > job as distributors properly. We appreciate good quality packaging! It's at least worth a discussion whether nitpicking at d/copyright is really helping the package quality at all, and if it's worth it. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature