[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Browserified files and DFSG

On 2016-07-11 09:19, Vincent Bernat wrote:
This debate already happened one year ago:


There was no conclusion. Different people have different opinions. In my
opinion, there are different way to consider what's the preferred form
of modification is and as long as the JS included in source is not
obfuscated/minified, it can be considered as a preferred form of
modification, so it's OK for Debian. There are several packages in the
archive which embed pre-concatenated JS.

Be upfront about it towards the ftp-masters and see what they think? (Of course, you could also just point at the precedent, but sometimes things slip in without ftp-master review.)

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Reply to: