On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. They're asking you to > provide the same licence for your contributions, as the licence for the > existing Gitlab software. Every FOSS project expects that, even if > they don't make such a formal statement of it. If all they want is to have contributions use the same license as the code they provide, why is that license not enough? Why is a separate contributor license agreement needed? -- Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature