Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)
On 08/06/16, 10:41pm, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 19:40 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> > > > model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> > > > system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion.
> > >
> > > You are not alone, but please do not call Gitlab CE not "real open source".
> > I do for every software which forces me to sign things like:
> > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/legal/individual_contributor_license_agreement.md
> [...]
>
> I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. They're asking you to
> provide the same licence for your contributions, as the licence for the
> existing Gitlab software. Every FOSS project expects that, even if
> they don't make such a formal statement of it.
>
> Ben.
Nodejs requires that as well. Nothing wrong with it.
And in that case, calling node.js not real open source, would be quite a
mistake.
--
⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co
Reply to: