Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was: Next steps for gitlab.debian)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +0000, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> But that doesn't mean we as a project have to run and keep maintaining
> >> all the things that were once shiney.
> >
> > +1
>
> That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore
> services rather than block adding a new service.
We aren't saying 'no'; we're saying 'please have a transition plan'.
Dropping a not-shiny-anymore service without a transition plan to move users of
the service off is not great. That said, maybe that's what we do. Announce a
date and move on.
--
Luca Filipozzi
http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian
Reply to: