Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was: Next steps for gitlab.debian)
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 08, Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> > gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> > because it's shiny?
> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
> "because it's shiny" is a reasonable selling point for gitlab...
But that doesn't mean we as a project have to run and keep maintaining
all the things that were once shiney.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- https://www.debian.org/
Reply to: